Many of New Zealand's most reputable child and family advocacy organisations are united in the campaign to repeal section 59 of the Crimes Act. Repeal gives a clear message that hitting children is not OK.

Section 59 of the Crimes Act 1961 currently states:

“Every parent of a child or...every person in the place of the parent of a child is justified in using force by way of correction towards the child, if the force used is reasonable in the circumstances”.

Section 59 is used exclusively in the courtroom, as a defence used by parents against prosecution.

The repeal of section 59 would eliminate this protection.

Full repeal is necessary because:

Hitting children is a risk factor in poor child and adult outcomes

Hitting children is the least effective way to improve child behaviour

Section 59 breaches New Zealand's international obligations in relation to Article 19 of UN Declaration on the Rights of the Child

We all have the right to live in families and communities that are free from violence.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

The pernicious influence of fundamentalist Christians

Fundamentalist Christian deny the legitimacy of any interpretation of the Bible other than theirs. And their interpretation is based upon the assumption that every word of the Bible is the literal word of God. All of which makes discussion difficult.


This has never been more so than in the present public discussion on Sue Bradford’s Bill. One of their leading advocates is Craig Smith of Family Integrity and what he has to say makes chilling reading. Here are a few quotes from his publication The Christian Foundations of the Institution of Corporal Correction:


Children are not little bundles of innocence: they are little bundles of depravity … Selfishness, violence, lying, cheating, stealing and other such manifestations of rebellion, are just the child unpacking some of this sinful foolishness from the vast store in his heart (p.3)


Mere words, you see, do not dislodge the foolishness and sin from the heart, whereas a smack will … Smacking does so much good for the child and you. It deals with all the issues. (p.5)


And then how to smack:


Smacking may be a 1-15 minute process. Go to a private place, collect the smacking rod, then fully discuss the crime. Ask the child to identify which of the four Ds [disobedience, disrespect, dishonesty, destructiveness]was broken and to explain why he needs a smack rather than a tongue lashing or isolation. Always give the opportunity to plead extenuating circumstances; be prepared to call in witnesses for cross examination; and if appropriate do not smack. The child must comply with your direction to hold still while you administer the smacking to the clothed bottom, not the back or legs. Do not be tempted to restrain a struggling child. Their admission of guilt, their agreement that a smack is necessary and the need to master self-discipline together with make it important that the child voluntarily submits to the discipline of smacking (p.7)


Craig Smith and Family Integrity are not alone in these repellent attitudes to children. A current issue of the Weekly Observer (16-22 June 2006) in the UK carried this eloquent criticism of such attitudes posturing in the name of Christianity. The author was the Rev. Giles Fraser, Vicar of Putney in East London:


Suffer, the little children


US evangelists are twisting the Bible to say that beating the young is a Christian doctrine


Pretty much all I remember from my prep school are the beatings: that lonely wait outside the headmaster’s study; the cane, the slipper, the table tennis bat. I remember my underpants filled with blood. I remember seething with frustration when they beat my brother. My mother had asked me to look after him. But there was nothing I could do as he was led toward the study in his little tartan dressing gown.


That was thirty years ago, but in time measured by the psyche it was yesterday. Thank God such things are now illegal in England. But there remain those determined to turn back the clock. “We are told that in England it is a crime to spank children” writes Debbi Pearl from No Greater Joy Ministries, following a row that erupted over the distribution of their literature in the UK. “Therefore Christians are not able to openly obey God in regard to biblical chastisement. They are in danger of having the state steal their children.”


The Pearls are evangelical Christians who believe corporal punishment is “doing God’s way”. With a mailing list of tens of thousands of parents, the Pearls say that the justification for their approach is in scripture: “He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes” (Proverbs 13:24)


Chastening begins early. “For the under-one-year-old, a little, 10-12 inch long, willowy branch (stripped of any knots that might break the skin) about one-eighth inch diameter is sufficient,” writes Michael Pearl. With older children he advises: “After a short explanation about bad attitudes and the need to love, patiently and calmly apply the rod to his backside. Somehow after eight or ten licks the poison is transformed into gushing love and contentment. The world becomes a beautiful place. A brand new child emerges. It makes an adult stare at the rod in wonder, trying to see what magic is contained therein.”


It is incredible to me that books such as this are available on Amazon; it is little short of incitement to child abuse. What makes the whole thing doubly sick is that it is done in the name of God. Apparently, the “proper application of the rod is essential to the Christian world-view”. Note “essential”.


Perhaps it shouldn’t come as a surprise. For, as evangelicals, the Pearls believe that salvation only comes through punishment and pain. God punishes his Son with crucifixion so that humanity might not have to face the Father’s anger. This image of God the father, for whom violence is an expression of tough love, is lodged deep in the evangelical imagination. And it twists a religion of forgiveness and compassion into something dark and cruel.


It is terrifying how deep this teaching penetrates into a philosophy of child rearing. Just as divine anger is deemed to be provoked by the original sin of human disobedience, the beating of children is seen as punishment for rebellion. According to Ted Tripp, in his monstrous bestseller, Shepherding a Child’s Heart, even babies who struggle while having their nappy changed are deemed to be rebellious and need punishment.


Last month Lynn Paddock of North Carolina was charged with the murder of her four-year-old son, Sean. She had apparently beaten him with a length of quarter-inch plumbing line – plastic tubing. Like many in her church, Paddock had turned to the Pearls’ resources on biblical parenting. The Pearls say chastisement with plumbing line is “a real attention getter”. Sean Paddock’s autopsy describes layers of bruises from his bottom to his shoulder.


What Jesus said about those who would harm children comes inevitably to mind: “It would be better for them if a millstone was hung about their neck, and that they were drowned in the depth of the sea.”

You are vistor number